Was Revelation written before or after the destruction of the temple in AD 70?
External Evidence for an Early Date Aspects of the text of the book of Revelation have been understood by some as being indicative of an earlier date. Chilton holds that since Scripture teaches that all prophecy would be complete by the end of the 70th week of Daniel Dan. We have a priori teaching from Scripture itself that all special revelation ended by A.
But Chilton assumes the 70th week is completed with the destruction of Jerusalem in A. These [allusions] naturally suggest the twofold inference that the book of Revelation and the Fourth Gospel must have been written before the Temple services had actually ceased, and by one who had not merely been intimately acquainted with, but probably at one time an actor in them.
This is not at all unusual. Further, there is no reason why direct revelation from God, as is the case with the book of Revelation, might not convey details not previously known to the prophet. Let the reader pause to make note of this frequent pattern involving internal evidence: The former interpretation of the evidence is nearly always admissible, but the latter conclusion does not necessarily follow.
An entire category of internal evidence surrounds the assertion that the Beast of Revelation Rev. Nero committed suicide never to rise again. We discuss these issues in greater depth in our discussion of Nero.
What is probably considered to be the most significant internal evidence for a pre-A. If the Temple were standing when Revelation was written, then it is indeed unmistakable that Revelation was written prior to the destruction of the Temple.
The problem is with the first part of the statement. Not only is this pattern of prophetic revelation concerning a future Temple found in Ezekiel, but also in Daniel Dan.
The chief preterist argument for the Neronic date from Revelation is the mention of the temple in Revelation Rev.
In both of these Old Testament prophetic books a Temple is mentioned that is not in existence at the time the author is writing.
Ezekiel received news of the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem in Ezekiel Eze. However, after receiving the news, in Ezekiel Eze.
A Critique of the Preterist View o "Soonf " and "Near" in Revelation Much of the recent interest in the preterist view can be attrib uted to the writing and teaching of Kennet5 Garh Gentry,y De- Mar,6 R. C. Sproul,7 and most recently, Hank HanegraafF, host of The Bible Answer Man radio broadcast.8 Preterist websites and conferences have further fueled the spread of this system of es. Book of Revelation Essay. The Book of Revelation is the last profound book in the New Testament - Book of Revelation Essay introduction. It conveys the significant purpose of Christianity by describing God’s plan for the world and his final judgment of the people by reinforcing the importance of faith and the concept of Christianity as a whole. There are two dates that are commonly mentioned for the writing of the Book of Revelation: (a) an early date - still during the lifetime of Caesar Nero, about the middle of the 60ies AD; and (b) a late date - about 95/96 AD furing the time of Caesar Domitian.
Moreover, Ezekiel, like John, is told to measure the Temple he sees in his vision. After all, Zechariah, writing during the Second Temple era, described a Temple future to his day. The internal evidence which early-date advocates assert as proof of a pre-A. In each case, the interpretation of the evidence is either flawed or overstated.
At most, the evidence makes a case for the possibility of a pre-A. Dominion Press,5.If we do not begin with the correct writing date of Revelation we cannot understand this great book. I will prove to you from Scripture that most people today start with the wrong date.
A very clinical book dealing with the date of the writing of the book of Revelation.
Mr. Gentry- a Preterist who believes the entire book of Revelation was fulfilled at the fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD- gives a very matter-of-a-fact account of his belief in the idea that the book /5(61). In the absence of external evidence in support of an early date for Revelation, preterists generally rely on what they perceive as internal support for their view.
Writing Style Differences It is contended that the Gospel of John has a much smoother style of Greek than does the Apocalypse. The date of the writing of Revelation is important.
A number of significant points hinge on the date. The book has been placed in the reigns of several Roman emperors including Claudius, Nero, Trajan and Domitian.
Some modern scholars have even suggested the reign of Vespasian as the time of writing. Mar 31, · She read it again in writing her latest book, “Revelations: Visions, Prophecy & Politics in the Book of Revelation. tattoos authorizing people to engage in Roman business, or the images of Roman emperors on stamps and coins.
The writer of Revelation was a Christian.
The author of Revelation hated Rome, but he also scorned. Dating the Book of Revelation. Click Here to listen. Adapted from the Afterword of The Last Sacrifice. if the apostle John were indeed writing in AD 95, it seems incredible that he would make no mention whatsoever of the most apocalyptic event in Jewish history — the demolition of Jerusalem and the destruction of the Temple at the hands.